Upon receiving an appeal against an administrative decision from the first-instance authority, the appellate authority, before examining the merits of the case, first assesses whether the formal requirements for the appeal have been met (information on formal deficiencies: open link), and then determines whether the appeal is admissible.
The inadmissibility of an appeal means that it cannot produce legal effects.
The admissibility of an appeal is assessed during the preliminary stage of the appellate proceedings, after the appeal and the case file have been forwarded to the appellate court. The appellate court assesses the admissibility of the appeal. This assessment may be substantive or procedural.
| Substantive inadmissibility of the appeal | |
|---|---|
|
Substantive inadmissibility occurs when it is determined that the subject matter of the appeal does not exist:
|
| Subjective inadmissibility of an appeal | |
|---|---|
| Subjective inadmissibility occurs, for example, when an appeal is filed by a person who is not a party to the administrative proceedings. |
The second-instance authority determines the inadmissibility of the appeal by means of a ruling, which is final. An appeal may be filed against this ruling with the provincial administrative court.
If the appeal is admissible and was filed within the time limit, the appellate authority proceeds to the substantive review of the case. In such a case, it does not issue any decision concluding the preliminary phase of the appellate proceedings.